Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kozul-Wright, R
Right arrow Articles by Rowthorn, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow F23 - Multinational Firms; International Business
Right arrow R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Oxf Rev Econ Policy 1998; 14:74-92
© 1998 Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Ltd

Article

Spoilt for choice? Multinational corporations and the geography of international production

R Kozul-Wright0
R Rowthorn1
0 United nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva, Switzerland
1 University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Abstract

This paper questions the view that foreign direct investment (FDI) is producing an integrated world production and trading system. Although multinational firms have a greater choice of locations than in the past, their recent investments abroad have taken place within a regional, rather than global, framework. The upsurge of FDI flows from North to South has been attracted by just a handful of fast-growing developing countries. The paper disputes the claim that the road to development is for poor countries to attract FDI on the scale observed in such countries as Malaysia. This claim involves a fallacy of composition. While FDI can make a valuable contribution, most countries will have to rely mainly on their own resources and indigenous producers. The paper argues that current proposals for a Multilateral Agreement on Investment neglect both the regional aspects of integration and the need of poorer countries to promote their domestic supply capabilities. Conflicts of interest which are ignored in the current rhetoric suggest the continuing relevance of a strategic policy approach to international production.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Strategic OrganizationHome page
R. M. Salomon
Spillovers to foreign market participants: assessing the impact of export strategies on innovative productivity
Strategic Organization, May 1, 2006; 4(2): 135 - 164.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 European Journal of Industrial RelationsHome page
P. Marginson
The Eurocompany and Euro Industrial Relations
European Journal of Industrial Relations, March 1, 2000; 6(1): 9 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Urban StudHome page
M. Boddy
Geographical Economics and Urban Competitiveness: A Critique
Urban Stud, May 1, 1999; 36(5-6): 811 - 842.
[PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.