| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oxf Rev Econ Policy 1998; 14:1-19
© 1998 Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Ltd
Article |
The assessment: environmental policy objectives, instruments, and institutions
New College, Oxford, UK
Abstract
The article provides a critique of British environmental policy, focusing in particular on the role of sustainable development as an organizing principle, the use of cost benefit analysis (CBA) and economic instruments, and the design of the institutions responsible for implementing policy. It is argued that, while considerable progress has been made in the theoretical literature to define sustainable development, successive governments in the UK have widened the definition to the point where it provides little guidance for policy. Obstacles to the use of CBA are discussed, as are the political constraints on implementing economic instruments in particular, the income effect. Finally, it is argued that the institutional design of the Environment Agency and the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions partly explains the overwhelming reliance on command-and-control regulation.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Vlachou Environmental regulation: a value-theoretic and class-based analysis Camb. J. Econ., July 1, 2005; 29(4): 577 - 599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Buti and B. Martinot Open Issues On the Implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact National Institute Economic Review, October 1, 2000; 174(1): 92 - 104. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||

