Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allsopp, C.
Right arrow Articles by Artis, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow E52 - Monetary Policy (Targets, Instruments, and Effects)
Right arrow E62 - Fiscal Policy
Right arrow F36 - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Oxf Rev Econ Policy 2003; 19:1-29
© 2003 Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Ltd


Article

The Assessment: EMU, Four Years On

Christopher Allsopp
Michael J. Artis

New College, Oxford
European University Institute and CEPR

Abstract

This paper reviews the functioning of the Economic and Monetary Union over the first 4 years of its existence. Monetary policy is viewed as having been of the ‘inflation-targeting’ type, but with a tendency towards delay and conservatism in adjustment, which may also reflect over-optimistic output growth forecasts. The resulting pressure on the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) illustrates the weakness in the ‘consensus view’ of the harmonious interaction of monetary, fiscal, and supply-side policies, which requires policy in all three areas to be ‘correct’. In discussing reform of the SGP, a looser but still constraining form of fiscal agreement is advocated. The supply-side and balance-of-payments issues involved in inter-country adjustment also interact importantly with the SGP and are identified as key areas of difficulty in a still ‘immature’ monetary union, with separate labour-market structures. Here the mechanisms for coordination are more or less absent.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cambridge J EconHome page
E. Stockhammer, O. Onaran, and S. Ederer
Functional income distribution and aggregate demand in the Euro area
Camb. J. Econ., January 1, 2009; 33(1): 139 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CESifo Economic StudiesHome page
M. Artis
The UK and the Eurozone
CESifo Economic Studies, March 1, 2006; 52(1): 32 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
National Institute Economic ReviewHome page
I. Begg and W. Schelkle
The Pact is Dead: Long Live the Pact
National Institute Economic Review, July 1, 2004; 189(1): 86 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.