Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barrell, R.
Right arrow Articles by Weale, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow E31 - Price Level; Inflation; Deflation
Right arrow E43 - Determination of Interest Rates; Term Structure of Interest Rates
Right arrow E52 - Monetary Policy (Targets, Instruments, and Effects)
Right arrow E62 - Fiscal Policy
Right arrow F36 - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Oxf Rev Econ Policy 2003; 19:132-148
© 2003 Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Ltd


Article

Designing and Choosing Macroeconomic Frameworks: The Position of the UK after Four Years of the Euro

Ray Barrell
Martin Weale

National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Abstract

Fiscal and monetary policy frameworks have become increasingly popular as disenchantment with active stabilization policy has increased. Frameworks need to be designed to achieve targets efficiently and stabilize the volatility of the economy. The current fiscal and monetary frameworks in the UK and the euro area can be improved. The UK economy went through major regime changes in the 1990s and as a result it has experienced more stable outcomes in the last few years. Whether the UK remains outside EMU or becomes a member, inflation, real interest rates, and the level of government borrowing would be similar. However, further gains to stability and hence to potential productivity are available if the UK becomes a member of EMU. The UK and the euro-area countries currently have economic cycles that are coherent, experiencing very similar cyclical positions. Although interest rates differ, it is clear that these small differences in rates have little impact on the cyclical position of these economies. In addition we find no evidence that output in the UK is excessively sensitive to changes in interest rates, at least when compared to the other large European countries.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
National Institute Economic ReviewHome page
R. Barrell
TEN YEARS OF ECONOMIC AND MONETARY UNION: INTRODUCTION
National Institute Economic Review, April 1, 2009; 208(1): 66 - 67.
[PDF]


Home page
National Institute Economic ReviewHome page
J. Garnier
HOW MUCH IS THE EURO AREA COMMON CYCLE AFFECTED BY THE UK?
National Institute Economic Review, April 1, 2009; 208(1): 109 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CESifo Economic StudiesHome page
M. Artis
The UK and the Eurozone
CESifo Economic Studies, March 1, 2006; 52(1): 32 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
National Institute Economic ReviewHome page
The World Economy
National Institute Economic Review, January 1, 2004; 187(1): 8 - 35.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.