Oxf Rev Econ Policy 2003; 19:132-148
© 2003 Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Ltd
Article |
Designing and Choosing Macroeconomic Frameworks: The Position of the UK after Four Years of the Euro
National Institute of Economic and Social Research
Abstract
Fiscal and monetary policy frameworks have become increasingly popular as disenchantment with active stabilization policy has increased. Frameworks need to be designed to achieve targets efficiently and stabilize the volatility of the economy. The current fiscal and monetary frameworks in the UK and the euro area can be improved. The UK economy went through major regime changes in the 1990s and as a result it has experienced more stable outcomes in the last few years. Whether the UK remains outside EMU or becomes a member, inflation, real interest rates, and the level of government borrowing would be similar. However, further gains to stability and hence to potential productivity are available if the UK becomes a member of EMU. The UK and the euro-area countries currently have economic cycles that are coherent, experiencing very similar cyclical positions. Although interest rates differ, it is clear that these small differences in rates have little impact on the cyclical position of these economies. In addition we find no evidence that output in the UK is excessively sensitive to changes in interest rates, at least when compared to the other large European countries.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Barrell TEN YEARS OF ECONOMIC AND MONETARY UNION: INTRODUCTION National Institute Economic Review, April 1, 2009; 208(1): 66 - 67. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Garnier HOW MUCH IS THE EURO AREA COMMON CYCLE AFFECTED BY THE UK? National Institute Economic Review, April 1, 2009; 208(1): 109 - 117. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Artis The UK and the Eurozone CESifo Economic Studies, March 1, 2006; 52(1): 32 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The World Economy National Institute Economic Review, January 1, 2004; 187(1): 8 - 35. [PDF] |
||||

