Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hancké, B.
Right arrow Articles by Soskice, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow E24 - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution
Right arrow E31 - Price Level; Inflation; Deflation
Right arrow E52 - Monetary Policy (Targets, Instruments, and Effects)
Right arrow F36 - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration
Right arrow J52 - Dispute Resolution: Strikes, Arbitration, and Mediation; Collective Bargaining
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Oxf Rev Econ Policy 2003; 19:149-160
© 2003 Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Ltd


Article

Wage-Setting and Inflation Targets in EMU

Bob Hancké
David Soskice

London School of Economics
Duke University

Abstract

Although the operation of national coordinated wage-bargaining systems in EMU has produced low inflation rates, EMU-wide inflation has been above the ECB target rate for the last 3 years. By contrast, under the ERM, inflation rates declined steadily after 1992 to below 2 per cent in both the last 2 years of the regime. It is argued that this was the consequence of two low-inflation incentives under ERM: (i) the Maastricht inflation condition for EMU entry; and (ii) the combination of the Bundesbank threat to raise interest rates if German wage and price inflation rose above acceptable limits, linked to the need for other ERM members to follow low German inflation to stay within the exchange-rate bands. These incentives no longer operate under EMU, where individual economies do not have an incentive to contribute to low EMU-wide inflation. We suggest that inflation coordination between the large EMU member states might contribute to a solution while permitting the continuation of real exchange-rate adjustments of smaller economies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Union PoliticsHome page
H. Enderlein
Adjusting to EMU: The Impact of Supranational Monetary Policy on Domestic Fiscal and Wage-Setting Institutions
European Union Politics, March 1, 2006; 7(1): 113 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of Industrial RelationsHome page
J. Visser
Beneath the Surface of Stability: New and Old Modes of Governance in European Industrial Relations
European Journal of Industrial Relations, November 1, 2005; 11(3): 287 - 306.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
B. Ebbinghaus and B. Kittel
European Rigidity Versus American Flexibility? The Institutional Adaptability of Collective Bargaining
Work and Occupations, May 1, 2005; 32(2): 163 - 195.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
B. Hancke and M. Rhodes
EMU and Labor Market Institutions in Europe: The Rise and Fall of National Social Pacts
Work and Occupations, May 1, 2005; 32(2): 196 - 228.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.