| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, VOL. 19, NO. 3, PP. 451-466
© 2003 Oxford University Press and the Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited
The Kyoto Protocol: A Review and Perspectives
Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim1
Abstract
International concern about climate change has led to the Kyoto Protocol, negotiated in 1997, which contains legally binding emission targets for industrialized countries to be achieved during the commitment period 200812. While proponents of the Protocol celebrate it as a breakthrough in international climate policy, opponents say that its approach, namely setting targets and timetables for emission reductions, is seriously flawed. This paper provides a critical assessment of the Protocol's potential performance and discusses amendments to foster its effectiveness and efficiency. It concludes that, even without any effective emission reductions in the initial commitment period, the ratification of Kyoto is important for the further policy process of climate protection. The Kyoto Protocol has established a flexible, broad-based, international mechanism that provides a valuable starting point for shaping efficient climate policies in the future.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Greenhalgh Why does market capitalism fail to deliver a sustainable environment and greater equality of incomes? Camb. J. Econ., November 1, 2005; 29(6): 1091 - 1109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
