Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baade, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow H71 - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
Right arrow L83 - Sports; Gambling; Recreation; Tourism
Right arrow R53 - Public Facility Location Analysis; Public Investment and Capital Stock
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, VOL. 19, NO. 4, PP. 585-597
© 2003 Oxford University Press and the Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited

Evaluating Subsidies for Professional Sports in the United States and Europe: A Public-Sector Primer

Robert A. Baade
Lake Forest College

Abstract

The character of subsidies for the construction of professional sports stadiums is changing in Europe and the United States. The incidence of these subsidies and the manner in which they are changing offers insight into an evolving relationship between the public and private sectors in building sports facilities. The changing financial imperatives this paper identifies and analyses suggest that the myopic concerns of cities coupled with powerful financial incentives for leagues and teams to build stadiums account for the spate of facilities constructed in the USA since Joe Robbie stadium in 1987. Growing public scepticism and resistance to stadium construction has been responsible for the private sector bearing a larger portion of the stadium construction costs, but teams have been more than compensated with increasingly generous leases. Cities have placated the public through the imposition of taxes that are either too small per capita to justify strong resistance or through deflecting the tax burden stadiums impose to non-residents. Since cities taken together are adopting the same strategies, the reality is that stadiums collectively are being paid for by local taxpayers. The public will continue to pay for stadiums until cities recognize their shared interests and take a collective stand against the professional sports monopolies. As long as the leagues continue to maintain an excess team for franchises, cities will continue to comply with team and league financial demands while searching for ways to placate an increasingly sceptical taxpaying public.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Urban StudHome page
C. Gratton, S. Shibli, and R. Coleman
Sport and Economic Regeneration in Cities
Urban Stud, May 1, 2005; 42(5-6): 985 - 999.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.