Skip Navigation

Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2005 21(3):340-356; doi:10.1093/oxrep/gri020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lundberg, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow J12 - Marriage; Marital Dissolution; Family Structure; Domestic Abuse
Right arrow J16 - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
Right arrow O15 - Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Oxford Review of Economic Policy vol. 21 no. 3 2005 © The Authors (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Sons, Daughters, and Parental Behaviour

Shelly Lundberg
University of Washington and IZA, Bonn1

Abstract

The prevalence of son preference and its implications for family behaviour in developing countries have received a great deal of scholarly attention, but child-gender bias is believed to be empirically unimportant in wealthy, non-traditional societies. Studies by sociologists and psychologists during the past 30 years, however, have documented consistent discrepancies between the behaviour of parents of sons and parents of daughters—boys tend to increase marital stability and marital satisfaction relative to girls, and fathers spend more time with, and are more involved with, sons than daughters. In recent years, economists have begun to contribute to the child-gender literature, re-examining the effects of sons and daughters on family structure and parental involvement with larger samples and greater concern for possible sources of selection bias. Other economic outcomes, such as market work and earnings, have also been studied, and some investigators have exploited the randomness of child gender as a source of exogenous variation in parental behaviour. In general, recent results suggest that child gender does affect family stability and the time allocation of parents, but it is not clear whether these responses reflect parental preferences for boys rather than girls or differences in the constraints parents face.

Footnotes

1 E-mail address: lundberg{at}u.washington.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur Sociol RevHome page
J. Bonke and G. Esping-Andersen
Family Investments in Children--Productivities, Preferences, and Parental Child Care
Eur. Sociol. Rev., November 23, 2009; (2009) jcp054v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Family IssuesHome page
K. B. Guzzo
Men's Visitation With Nonresidential Children: Do Characteristics of Coresidential and Nonresidential Children Matter?
Journal of Family Issues, July 1, 2009; 30(7): 921 - 944.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J EpidemiolHome page
D. W Lawson and R. Mace
Sibling configuration and childhood growth in contemporary British families
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2008; 37(6): 1408 - 1421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.