Skip Navigation

Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2005 21(4):524-531; doi:10.1093/oxrep/gri030
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garnaut, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow B13 - Neoclassical through 1925
Right arrow B22 - Macroeconomics
Right arrow E52 - Monetary Policy (Targets, Instruments, and Effects)
Right arrow E62 - Fiscal Policy
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Oxford Review of Economic Policy vol. 21 no. 4 2005 © The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Is Macroeconomics Dead? Monetary and Fiscal Policy in Historical Context

Ross Garnaut
Australian National University1

Abstract

There was no macroeconomic policy in the classical system of economic thought. Monetary policy was determined without discretion within the Gold Standard, and budget outcomes were guided by a ‘balanced budget rule’. Intellectual and policy support for the classical rules evaporated when large shocks upset the classical adjustment mechanisms and led to high and persistent unemployment. For a number of decades after Keynes's general theory, discretionary adjustment of fiscal and monetary policy to maintain balance between supply capacity of the economy and demand replaced the classical rules. This has now, in turn, been replaced by a variation on the classical theme. A ‘goods and services standard’, designed to keep inflation steady and low, a freely floating exchange rate, and a ‘small, steady budget surplus’ are the elements of the new system in Australia. This has worked well enough in the particular circumstances of the past one and a half decades, but would be vulnerable to a reversal of recent Australian good fortune in its terms of trade.


Footnotes

1 E-mail address: ross.garnaut{at}anu.edu.au


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.