Skip Navigation

Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2006 22(3):330-348; doi:10.1093/oxrep/grj020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hines, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow H20 - General
Right arrow H50 - General
Right arrow H73 - Interjurisdictional Differentials and Their Effects
Right arrow H87 - International Fiscal Issues; International Public Goods
Right arrow I31 - General Welfare
Right arrow I38 - Government Policy; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
Right arrow P16 - Political Economy
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Oxford Review of Economic Policy vol. 22 no. 3 2006 © The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Will Social Welfare Expenditures Survive Tax Competition?

James R. Hines, Jr
University of Michigan and NBER1

Abstract

Increasing economic openness creates demands for social welfare programmes designed to cushion the impact of economic changes, but may also encourage governments to reduce tax rates to attract mobile economic resources. Competitive tax reductions could then prevent governments from being able to finance significant welfare spending. Alternatively, economic globalization might improve the ability of governments to afford social welfare programmes—and several considerations point in this direction. First, taxes on internationally mobile activity represent only small fractions of total revenue collections; personal income taxes, value-added taxes, and social insurance contributions finance most social welfare spending. Second, international competition need not reduce taxes, and indeed, over the past 25 years, corporate tax collections have remained high as fractions of GDP and total taxes. Third, the vitality of a country's economy largely determines its level of social spending. To the extent that incomes rise as a result, greater economic openness should strengthen provision of social welfare.

Footnotes

1 E-mail address: jrhines{at}umich.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 OXF REV ECON POLICYHome page
D. Dharmapala
What problems and opportunities are created by tax havens?
Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy, December 1, 2008; 24(4): 661 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Afr EconHome page
T. Ajam and A. Janine
Fiscal Renaissance in a Democratic South Africa
J. Afr. Econ., November 1, 2007; 16(5): 745 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.