Skip Navigation

Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2007 23(2):135-142; doi:10.1093/oxrep/grm021
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhaskar, V.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press.

This article appears in the following Oxford Review of Economic Policy issue: INDIA [View the issue table of contents]

India's development in the era of growth

V. Bhaskar*
Bishnupriya Gupta**

* University College London, e-mail: v.bhaskar{at}ucl.ac.uk
** University of Warwick, e-mail: b.gupta{at}warwick.ac.uk


   Abstract

The recent growth pattern of India is set in the context of the parallel experience of China, the experience of poverty reduction is reviewed, and a number of papers illuminating India's development are introduced.

Key Words: India • growth • poverty


We thank Chris Allsopp and Andrew Glyn for valuable suggestions. The errors are ours.

1 A search for ‘China’ in the Working Papers of the US National Bureau of Economic Research yields twice as many papers over the past 5 years as a search for ‘India’.

2 http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpp2006/wpp2006_highlights.pdf

3 See Datt and Ravallion (2002), based on calculations using the World Bank's Poverty Monitoring database.

4 In an interesting paper, Banerjee and Piketty (2005) use tax returns to show that the shares of the top 1, 0.1, and 0.001 per cent of the population rose in the period since the 1980s, reversing the equalizing trend since Independence.

5 Bosworth and Collins report an assumed capital profit share of 40 per cent, which implies that capital per worker grew in India at 1.8/0.4 per cent = 4.5 per cent per year over the period 1993–2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Global Social PolicyHome page
J. Corrigall, S. Plagerson, C. Lund, and J. Myers
Global Trade and Mental Health
Global Social Policy, December 1, 2008; 8(3): 335 - 358.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.