Skip Navigation

Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2008 24(2):298-321; doi:10.1093/oxrep/grn017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stavins, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. For permissions please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Oxford Review of Economic Policy issue: CLIMATE CHANGE [View the issue table of contents]

Addressing climate change with a comprehensive US cap-and-trade system

Robert N. Stavins*
* John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, National Bureau of Economic Research, and Resources for the Future, e-mail: robert_stavins{at}harvard.edu


   Abstract

There is growing impetus for a domestic US climate policy that can provide meaningful reductions in emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases. I describe and analyse an up-stream, economy-wide CO2 cap-and-trade system which implements a gradual trajectory of emissions reductions (with inclusion over time of non-CO2 greenhouse gases), and includes mechanisms to reduce cost uncertainty. Initially, half of the allowances are allocated through auction and half through free distribution, with the share being auctioned gradually increasing to 100 per cent over 25 years. The system provides for linkage with emission-reduction credit projects in other countries, harmonization over time with effective cap-and-trade systems in other countries and regions, and appropriate linkage with actions taken in other countries, in order to establish a level playing field among domestically produced and imported products.

Key Words: cap-and-trade system • carbon dioxide • greenhouse gas emissions • global climate change • carbon taxes


1 Massachusetts et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency et al., No. 05-1120, argued 29 November 2006, decided 2 April 2007.

2 For a timely discussion of relevant auction design issues in carbon markets, see Burtraw et al. (2007).

3 ‘Commensurate action’ is defined as other countries taking action that is globally cost-effective, for example by employing cap-and-trade systems with the same allowance price or equivalent carbon taxes.

4 For discussion of the temporal dimension of climate policy, see Helm et al. (2005).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
OXF REV ECON POLICYHome page
D. Helm
Climate-change policy: why has so little been achieved?
Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy, June 1, 2008; 24(2): 211 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.