Skip Navigation

Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2008 24(4):625-638; doi:10.1093/oxrep/grn037
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Devereux, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. For permissions please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Oxford Review of Economic Policy issue: BUSINESS TAXATION IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD [View the issue table of contents]

Business taxation in a globalized world

Michael P. Devereux*
* Centre for Business Taxation, Saïd Business School, Oxford University, e-mail: michael.devereux{at}sbs.ox.ac.uk


   Abstract

This paper addresses broad issues concerning taxes on company profit in a globalized world in which companies, capital, and profit can move easily between countries. It considers reasons for national taxation of company profit in such a world, and reviews the development of such taxes in the OECD. The role played by tax havens is discussed and evidence on the responsiveness of companies to differences in taxation across countries is presented. A central issue is the allocation of taxable profit between countries. Existing practice has no clear rationale. Recent proposals for fundamental reform in the EU are discussed.

Key Words: corporation tax • optimal international taxation


1 For recent empirical evidence on the effective incidence of corporation tax, see Arulampalam et al. (2008).

2 These arguments are discussed in more detail by Bond (2000).

3 See Bond and Devereux (2002), and Auerbach et al. (2007).

4 The exceptions are: Ireland, which in 1982 had a special 10 per cent tax rate on manufacturing, shown here; Italy, with a very small increase; and Spain, which had the same rate in 1982 and 2007.

5 These are taxes levied by the country from which the payment is made; such taxes can be levied on payments of dividends, interest, and royalties.

6 As well as having a lower corporation tax rate, Ireland has a much simpler taxation structure. For example, the UK has complex anti-avoidance rules, known as the controlled foreign company (CFC) regime. Ireland does not have an equivalent. To be tax resident in Ireland typically must involve moving the effective management and control of the company to Ireland. However, exactly what this means in practice remains unclear.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.