Skip Navigation

Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2009 25(1):3-16; doi:10.1093/oxrep/grp007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. For permissions please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Oxford Review of Economic Policy issue: CAPITALISM AND INEQUALITY [View the issue table of contents]

Factor shares: the principal problem of political economy?

A. B. Atkinson*
* Nuffield College, Oxford, e-mail: tony.atkinson{at}nuffield.ox.ac.uk


   Abstract

This paper identifies three reasons for studying factor shares: to make a link between incomes at the macroeconomic level (national accounts) and incomes at the level of the household; to help understand inequality in the personal distribution of income; and to address the concern of social justice with the fairness of different sources of income. In each case, I explore the implications and point to ways in which the analysis could be taken forward in a twenty-first-century treatment of the classical problem of political economy.

Key Words: factor shares • wages • profits • distribution


Helpful comments on earlier versions were provided by Wiemer Salverda, the referees, and participants in the September 2008 Workshop on Inequality, Politics and Unemployment that formed part of the Celebration of Andrew Glyn's Life and Work.

Although they would be less impressed to read that the methods adopted to measure value added in the financial services sector may have meant that half of the reported value added could have been illusory (Weale, 2009, p. 7).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.