Oxf Rev Econ Policy 1998; 14:18-29
© 1998 Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Ltd
Article |
Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity
Institute of Development Statistics, Indiana University, USA
Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, UK
Abstract
A paradox has been the emergence of the importance of local proximity and geographic clusters precisely at a time when globalization seems to dominate economic activity. The purpose of this paper is to resolve this paradox by explaining why and how geography matters for innovative activity and ultimately for the international comparative advantage. Globalization and the telecommunications revolution have triggered a shift in the comparative advantage of the leading developed countries towards an increased importance of innovative activity. This shift in comparative advantage has increased the value of knowledge-based economic activity. Since knowledge is generated and transmitted more efficiently via local proximity, economic activity based on new knowledge has a high propensity to cluster within a geographic region. This has triggered a fundamental shift in public policy towards business, away from policies constraining the freedom of firms to contract and towards a new set of enabling policies, implemented at the regional and local levels.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. N. Link and J. T. Scott The economics of university research parks Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy, December 1, 2007; 23(4): 661 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. E. Shin, J. Agnew, S. Breau, and P. Richardson Place and the Geography of Italian Export Performance European Urban and Regional Studies, July 1, 2006; 13(3): 195 - 208. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. C. Cheshire Resurgent Cities, Urban Myths and Policy Hubris: What We Need to Know Urban Stud, July 1, 2006; 43(8): 1231 - 1246. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. C. J. Caniels and H. A. Romijn What drives innovativeness in industrial clusters? Transcending the debate Camb. J. Econ., July 1, 2005; 29(4): 497 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T.-s. Hu, C.-y. Lin, and S.-L. Chang Role of Interaction between Technological Communities and Industrial Clustering in Innovative Activity: The Case of Hsinchu District, Taiwan Urban Stud, June 1, 2005; 42(7): 1139 - 1160. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Hewitt-Dundas, B. Andreosso-O'Callaghan, M. Crone, and S. Roper Knowledge Transfers from Multinational Plants in Ireland: A Cross-Border Comparison of Supply-Chain Linkages European Urban and Regional Studies, January 1, 2005; 12(1): 23 - 43. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Lynskey Determinants of Innovative Activity in Japanese Technology-based Start-up Firms International Small Business Journal, April 1, 2004; 22(2): 159 - 196. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Walcott Analyzing an Innovative Environment: San Diego as a Bioscience Beachhead Economic Development Quarterly, May 1, 2002; 16(2): 99 - 114. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. L. Howells Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography Urban Stud, May 1, 2002; 39(5-6): 871 - 884. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Cooke Biotechnology Clusters as Regional, Sectoral Innovation Systems International Regional Science Review, January 1, 2002; 25(1): 8 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Tickell Progress in the geography of services II: services, the state and the rearticulation of capitalism Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 2001; 25(2): 283 - 292. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. F. MADDEN Jobs, Cities, and Suburbs in the Global Economy The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, November 1, 2000; 572(1): 78 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Boddy Geographical Economics and Urban Competitiveness: A Critique Urban Stud, May 1, 1999; 36(5-6): 811 - 842. [PDF]
|
|