Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buti, M
Right arrow Articles by Ongena, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow E52 - Monetary Policy (Targets, Instruments, and Effects)
Right arrow E62 - Fiscal Policy
Right arrow F36 - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Oxf Rev Econ Policy 1998; 14:81-97
© 1998 Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Ltd


Article

Fiscal discipline and flexibility in EMU: the implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact

M Buti
D Franco0
H Ongena

European Commission
0 Bank of Italy

Abstract

Fiscal discipline to safeguard the credibility of the single monetary authority and fiscal flexibility to respond to country-specific shocks are two core principles governing budgetary policy in EMU. The Stability and Growth Pact aims at ensuring the first objective. To comply with the requirements of the pact, EU members need to achieve a 'close to balance or surplus' position and change their budgetary behaviour in periods of cyclical upturns by refraining from spending the 'growth dividend'. Past experience shows that fiscal laxity does not buy more effective stabilization. Once EMU countries have achieved their medium-term target, their automatic stabilizers will be able to operate fully, thus helping in smoothing out cyclical fluctuations. The main potential problems in the implementation of the pact may arise in the early years of EMU, during the transition to a balanced budget, in the event of a slow-down in economic activity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CESifo Economic StudiesHome page
M. Buti, J. N. Martins, and A. Turrini
From Deficits to Debt and Back: Political Incentives under Numerical Fiscal Rules
CESifo Economic Studies, March 1, 2007; 53(1): 115 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of European Social PolicyHome page
D. G. Mayes
Social exclusion and macro-economic policy in Europe: a problem of dynamic and spatial change
Journal of European Social Policy, August 1, 2002; 12(3): 195 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Union PoliticsHome page
M. Hallerberg
Introduction: Fiscal Policy in the European Union
European Union Politics, June 1, 2002; 3(2): 139 - 150.
[PDF]


Home page
National Institute Economic ReviewHome page
M. Buti and B. Martinot
Open Issues On the Implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact
National Institute Economic Review, October 1, 2000; 174(1): 92 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.