Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stiglitz, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow F32 - Current Account Adjustment; Short-Term Capital Movements
Right arrow F33 - International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, VOL. 20, NO. 1, PP. 57-71
© Oxford University Press and the Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited 2004; all rights reserved.

Capital-market Liberalization, Globalization, and the IMF

Joseph E. Stiglitz
Columbia University1

Abstract

One of the most controversial aspects of globalization is capital-market liberalization—not so much the liberalization of rules governing foreign direct investment, but those affecting short-term capital flows, speculative hot capital that can come into and out of a country. In the 1980s and 1990s, the IMF and the US Treasury tried to push capital-market liberalization around the world, encountering enormous opposition, not only from developing countries, but from economists who were less enamoured of the doctrines of free and unfettered markets, of market fundamentalism, that were at that time being preached by the international economic institutions. The economic crises of the late 1990s and early years of the new millennium, which were partly, or even largely, attributable to capital-market liberalization, reinforced those reservations. This paper takes as its point of departure a recent IMF paper, to provide insights both into how the IMF could have gone so wrong in its advocacy of capital-market liberalization and into why capital-market liberalization has so often led to increased economic instability, not to economic growth.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cambridge J EconHome page
P. Arestis and A. Caner
Capital account liberalisation and poverty: how close is the link?
Camb. J. Econ., November 10, 2009; (2009) bep062v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ECON GEOGRHome page
A. van Hulten and M. Webber
Do developing countries need 'good' institutions and policies and deep financial markets to benefit from capital account liberalization?
J. Econ. Geogr., April 2, 2009; (2009) lbp013v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Contrib Pol EconomyHome page
A. Singh
GLOBALISATION AND THE REGULATION OF FDI: NEW PROPOSALS FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND JAPAN
Contrib. Pol. Economy, August 1, 2005; 24(1): 99 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.